Health Psychology Research / HPR / Volume 14 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.14440/hpr.0347
Cite this article
17
Download
67
Citations
349
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of Mental Health Training on Behavioral Intentions Among Primary Healthcare Workers in Iraq: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Nashwan Nadhim Shwan1,2* Abdulqader H. Hamad1
Show Less
1 Department of Psychiatric Nursing, College of Nursing, Hawler Medical University, Erbil 44001, Erbil Governorate, Iraq
2 Department of Community Health Nursing, College of Nursing, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk 36001, Kirkuk Governorate, Iraq
HPR 2026 , 14(1), e81240065; https://doi.org/10.14440/hpr.0347
Submitted: 28 October 2025 | Revised: 16 January 2026 | Accepted: 23 January 2026 | Published: 11 March 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). Licensee Health Psychology Research, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Background

In Iraq, an estimated 20% of the population lives with a mental disorder, yet approximately 90% do not receive treatment. To address this treatment gap, primary healthcare workers (PHCWs) are essential; however, their involvement is hindered by stigma and a lack of training.

Objective

This study aims to assess the effect of brief mental health training on the behavioral intentions of PHCWs.

Methods

We conducted a randomized controlled trial in a conflict-affected region between November 2024 and August 2025. A total of 174 PHCWs were randomly assigned to either receive four days of intensive mental health training (n = 87) or continue their usual clinical work without additional training (n = 87). We measured participants’ behavioral intentions (willingness to engage with people experiencing mental health problems) using the validated Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale at baseline and three months after the intervention.

Results

By the end of the study, 162 participants remained (n = 81 per group; 6.9% dropped out). Those who received training reported significantly stronger intentions to support people with mental health conditions (median = 16) compared to the control group (median = 15; p = 0.007; moderate effect size [r = 0.30]). Within-group analysis revealed large improvements in the intervention group (p < 0.001, r = 0.52) but no significant change in controls (p = 0.218). The proportion achieving high intended behavior increased from 30.9% to 56.8% in the intervention group versus 33.3% to 46.9% in controls.

Conclusion

This randomized controlled trial provides preliminary evidence that brief mental health training significantly improves behavioral intentions among PHCWs in post-conflict settings. Because behavioral intentions explain approximately 30–50% of behavioral variance, these findings support the need for larger trials evaluating actual clinical practice changes and patient outcomes.

Keywords
Primary health care
Behavioral intentions
Randomized controlled trial
Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale
Conflict-affected settings
Funding
None.
References
  1. Santomauro DF, Herrera AMM, Shadid J, et al. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2021;398(10312):1700-1712. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-7

 

  1. De Kock JH, Latham HA, Leslie SJ, et al. A rapidreview of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10070-3

 

  1. World Health Organization. World mental health report: Transforming mental health for all. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.

 

  1. Ibrahim H, Ertl V, Catani C, Ismail AA, Neuner F. The validity of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) as screening instrument with Kurdish and Arab displaced populations living in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1839-z

 

  1. Al-Uzri M, Al-Taiar H, Abdulghani EA, Abbas YA, Suleman M. Impact of mhGAP-IG training on primary care physicians’ knowledge of mental, neurological and substance use disorders in Iraq. BJPsych Int. 2024;21(1):14-16. doi: 10.1192/bji.2023.36

 

  1. Mohammed IA, Hamdan AS, Jaber OA, Abbas GH. Assessment of anxiety and depression status among health care workers from Baghdad post cure from COVID-19. J Fac Med Baghdad. 2021;63(3). doi: 10.32007/jfacmedbagdad.6331835

 

  1. Saeed BA, Shabila NP, Aziz AJ. Stress and anxiety among physicians during the COVID-19 outbreak in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region: An online survey. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0253903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253903

 

  1. Keynejad RC, Spagnolo J, Thornicroft G. Mental healthcare in primary and community-based settings: evidence beyond the WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide. BMJ Ment Health. 2022;25(e1):e1-e7. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300401

 

  1. Ueda J, Yamaguchi S, Matsuda Y, et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a short video-based educational program for improving mental health literacy among schoolteachers. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:596293. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.596293

 

  1. Jordans MJ, Kohrt BA, Sangraula M, et al. Effectiveness of Group Problem Management Plus, a brief psychological intervention for adults affected by humanitarian disasters in Nepal: A cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2021;18(6):e1003621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003621

 

  1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

 

  1. Sheeran P, Webb T. The Intention-behavior gap. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2016;10(9):503- 518. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12265

 

  1. Rhodes RE, Dickau L. Experimental evidence for the intention–behavior relationship in the physical activity domain: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2012;31(6):724-732. doi: 10.1037/a0027290

 

  1. Teixeira-Santos LM, Ventura FIQS, Santos JAO, Almeida IF, Abreu WCP. Mental health training programs for non-health professionals and volunteers working with asylum-seekers and refugees: scoping review. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2023;57:e20220447. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0447en

 

  1. Evans-Lacko S, Rose D, Little K, et al. Development and psychometric properties of the reported and intended behaviour scale (RIBS): a stigma-related behaviour measure. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2011;20(3):263-271. doi: 10.1017/S2045796011000308

 

  1. Zafar M, Alshammari RF. Primary Health Care Workers Turnover intention and Organizational behavior: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. SN Compr Clin Med. 2024;6(1):94. doi: 10.1007/s42399-024-01720-3

 

  1. Tang MY, Rhodes S, Powell R, et al. How effective are social norms interventions in changing the clinical behaviours of healthcare workers? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Implement Sci. 2021;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01072-1

 

  1. Gupta B, Li D, Dong P, Acri MC. From intention to action: A systematic literature review of provider behaviour change-focused interventions in physical health and behavioural health settings. J Eval Clin Pract. 2021;27(6):1429-1445. doi: 10.1111/jep.13547

 

  1. Cotterill S, Powell R, Rhodes S, et al. The impact of social norms interventions on clinical behaviour change among health workers: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1077-6

 

  1. Ayivi-Vinz G, Tremblay M, Gadio S, et al. Impact of educational activity formats, online or in-person, on the intention of medical specialiststo adopt a clinical behaviour: a comparative study. J CME. 2024;13(1):2363550. doi: 10.1080/28338073.2024.2363550

 

  1. Patey AM, Fontaine G, Francis JJ, McCleary N, Presseau J, Grimshaw JM. Healthcare professional behaviour: health impact, prevalence of evidence-based behaviours, correlates and interventions. Psychol Health. 2023;38(6):766-794. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2100887

 

  1. Sijbrandij M, Acarturk C, Bird M, et al. Strengthening mental health care systems for Syrian refugees in Europe and the Middle East: integrating scalable psychological interventions in eight countries. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017;8(suppl 2):1388102. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1388102

 

  1. Wainberg ML, Scorza P, Shultz JM, et al. Challenges and opportunities in global mental health: a research-to-practice perspective. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19(5):28. doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0780-z

 

  1. Uphoff EP, Lombardo C, Johnston G, et al. Mental health among healthcare workers and other vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 pandemic and other coronavirus outbreaks: A rapid systematic review. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0254821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254821

 

  1. World Health Organization. Guidance on community mental health services: promoting person-centred and rights-based approaches. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707 [Last accessed on 2026 March 3].

 

  1. Kokota D, Lund C, Ahrens J, Breuer E, Gilfillan S. Evaluation of mhGAP training for primary healthcare workers in Mulanje, Malawi: a quasi-experimental and time series study. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020;14(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-0337-0

 

  1. Hasan NN, Mehammed-Ameen OH, Ali SM. Attitudes of nursing and medicine undergraduates students towards mental illness at Kirkuk University. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2019;10(5):678-683. doi: 10.5958/0976-5506.2019.00134.7
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Share
Back to top
Health Psychology Research, Electronic ISSN: 2420-8124 Published by Health Psychology Research